New York Civil War Reenactors Forum Forum Index New York Civil War Reenactors Forum
Hosted and provided by the 149th NYSV Civil War Reenactor Unit
 
 Home   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups    CalendarCalendar    RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Welcome
Welcome to New York Civil War Reenactors Forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!

wedding rings

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    New York Civil War Reenactors Forum Forum Index -> Uniforms, Equipment & Gear
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
wilber6150
Provost


Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Posts: 28
Location: Frankfort, NY

PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:42 pm    Post subject: wedding rings Reply with quote

I've seen in several posts on other forums that wedding rings were worn on the opposite hand in the 1860's then we do now, does anyone have any research or articles on this.

_________________
thanks

Will Coffey


proud member of the 149th NYSV
Back to top
Dan149thNY
Commander in Chief


Joined: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 64
Location: Central New York State

PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't know anything about that Will, I've never seen anything. On a slightly different note though, I recently learned that when a man and wife shared ajoining burial plots, they were supposed to be buried on the same side that they were on when they walked down the aisle together, never knew that.

_________________
Dan Houde

Proud Member Co. B, 149th NYSV
Cobleskill #394 F.&A.M.
Cpl. James Tanner Camp #134 SUVCW
Back to top
Scourge of Broome County
High Private


Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 25
Location: Endwell New York

PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 8:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Will.
Heres another reason to order Columbia Rifles Research Compendium 1st edition.Because that topic is covered.

_________________
Brian W.Swartz
Back to top
Dan149thNY
Commander in Chief


Joined: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 64
Location: Central New York State

PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 8:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Brian,

It's not covered in the 2nd edition, but I did just find it in the first edition. Looks like the left was more prominent, at least when worn on the ring finger. When worn on the little finger it was a 50/50 split between right and left. I'll also add that of those cases reviewed, 80% had them on their little finger while only 18% on the ring finger and 2% on the middle finger.

_________________
Dan Houde

Proud Member Co. B, 149th NYSV
Cobleskill #394 F.&A.M.
Cpl. James Tanner Camp #134 SUVCW
Back to top
wilber6150
Provost


Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Posts: 28
Location: Frankfort, NY

PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 8:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah the CRRC first edition is a rare bird indeed.

_________________
thanks

Will Coffey


proud member of the 149th NYSV
Back to top
TParker
Fresh Fish


Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 6
Location: Western New York

PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 8:58 pm    Post subject: Pure speculation here Reply with quote

Is it possible that those who wore their rings during their service found that the hardships of duty and exercise on their hand caused the rings to be uncomfortable on their "normal" ring finger and moved the ring to a smaller finger such as the little finger? I know if I am actively using my hands for work the ring sometimes gets tight on my ring finger and needs to be moved to my little finger for a while. Just a guess, but I would imagine married soldiers wouldn't want to remove their ring entirely, and I know of no research that indicates the little finger was ever customary for wedding ring wear. The ring finger and middle finger, certainly both have documentation, but I haven't found any for the little finger (and please point me to the source if anyone has seen it). They certainly wouldn't have had access to a jeweler to resize the ring, so shifting to a smaller finger may have been an expedient way to retain it.

_________________
Terry Parker
Co. K
136th NYVI
Back to top
Bummer
Recruit


Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 4
Location: Late of Cherry Valley, NY (now NC)

PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 5:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For what it is worth, Germans wear them on their right hand...perhaps some are of German extraction?

_________________
Spence Waldron
Coffee Cooler

"Straggled out and did not catch up."
Back to top
Dan149thNY
Commander in Chief


Joined: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 64
Location: Central New York State

PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 3:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have to think that several things would come into play, personal preference for instance, as well as like Bummer said, possibly the custom where they were raised.

_________________
Dan Houde

Proud Member Co. B, 149th NYSV
Cobleskill #394 F.&A.M.
Cpl. James Tanner Camp #134 SUVCW
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    New York Civil War Reenactors Forum Forum Index -> Uniforms, Equipment & Gear All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Community Chest


Powered by phpBB
Hosted by FreeForums.org